TRANSFORM YOUR TEAM'S SEASON WITH PROFESSIONALLY PLANNED SESSIONS
Use our expert plans or build your own using our library of over 700+ drills, and easy-to-use tools.
JOIN NOW
Why donât teams set up a driving maul directly from a penalty, rather than risk losing a scrum or line out?
Hello Ade,
It has been shown in international test matches and premiership matches statistics that the scoring rate from Penalty Line-outs and scrums are significantly higher then from a "tap" and go penalty forming a maul.
By law a maul includes two attackers including the ball carrier and a player of the defending team. Meaning that a player would have to "risk" losing the ball in a maul from a tap and go penalty. However, if they set up a driving maul from a set piece the likeliness of ball retention and scoring is significantly higher as the ball is protected by more then two players.
in more ways than one
The teams winning in 2026 aren't taking risks - they're grinding out territory with relentless pick-and-go phases. Here's how to coach it.
Player safety technology has arrived at every level of rugby. Here's what coaches need to know about smart mouthguards, concussion protocols, and training safely.
From France's collision dominance to England's folding defence - what grassroots coaches can learn from the 2026 Six Nations.
Use our expert plans or build your own using our library of over 700+ drills, and easy-to-use tools.
JOIN NOW