Defending against 2 center halves

Defending against 2 center halves

Hi can you help me setting a defence against a team playing 2 centre halves. My team plays conventional style 5321 . Thanks

MARK Coach, Australia
TOP ANSWER
Jon RoyceCoach, England

In essence the opponents are overloading midfield: playing four against your three (IR/CH/IL). The first question is: where are your opponents getting the extra man in midfield from?

If it is an opposition forward operating in midfield, you have four defenders marking two players: so it’s easy to push one of your back four (RH/RB/LB or LH) into midfield negating the overload. When playing a more zonally based 5:3:2:1 system: different defenders can pick up the free midfield player dependant on where they appear and where the ball is positioned: it really is all about angles and distances and thus passing options (or the lack thereof). Communication is absolutely paramount: done successfully this method retains the structural integrity of your team.

If your opposition are rolling one of the back four into midfield going three at the back, then you have several options:

  1. You can play with two forwards and drop one forward into midfield to play four in midfield.
  2. You can move your spare Full Back into midfield, creating a four v four in midfield
  3. You can compress the game by retreating and playing half court, starting to defend from the half way line or even deeper, closing down receivers and intercepting passes over short distances

The choice of method really depends on your teams strengths relative to your opponents. In choices 1. and 3. you cede the initiative to your opponents by defending deep and look to counter attack. On choice 2. you can push high up the field, but skilful midfield movement by your opponents can expose your defenders one versus one in plenty of space: how good are your defenders in this situation?

As with so many tactical and strategic questions there is no right answer but given your teams natural 5:3:2:1 style then number 2 may be more natural and attack minded.

One word of caution I haven’t seen a team play 5:3:2:1 for thirty years although many profess to do so. Perhaps another question for another day!

ANSWERS
Jon RoyceCoach, England

In essence the opponents are overloading midfield: playing four against your three (IR/CH/IL). The first question is: where are your opponents getting the extra man in midfield from?

If it is an opposition forward operating in midfield, you have four defenders marking two players: so it’s easy to push one of your back four (RH/RB/LB or LH) into midfield negating the overload. When playing a more zonally based 5:3:2:1 system: different defenders can pick up the free midfield player dependant on where they appear and where the ball is positioned: it really is all about angles and distances and thus passing options (or the lack thereof). Communication is absolutely paramount: done successfully this method retains the structural integrity of your team.

If your opposition are rolling one of the back four into midfield going three at the back, then you have several options:

  1. You can play with two forwards and drop one forward into midfield to play four in midfield.
  2. You can move your spare Full Back into midfield, creating a four v four in midfield
  3. You can compress the game by retreating and playing half court, starting to defend from the half way line or even deeper, closing down receivers and intercepting passes over short distances

The choice of method really depends on your teams strengths relative to your opponents. In choices 1. and 3. you cede the initiative to your opponents by defending deep and look to counter attack. On choice 2. you can push high up the field, but skilful midfield movement by your opponents can expose your defenders one versus one in plenty of space: how good are your defenders in this situation?

As with so many tactical and strategic questions there is no right answer but given your teams natural 5:3:2:1 style then number 2 may be more natural and attack minded.

One word of caution I haven’t seen a team play 5:3:2:1 for thirty years although many profess to do so. Perhaps another question for another day!

Login or Join Now for FREE to post your answer

JOIN SPORTPLAN FOR FREE

  • search our library of 1000+ hockey drills
  • create your own professional coaching plans
  • or access our tried and tested plans

TRANSFORM YOUR TEAM'S SEASON WITH PROFESSIONALLY PLANNED SESSIONS

Use our expert plans or build your own using our library of over 700+ drills, and easy-to-use tools.

JOIN NOW

VIEW MORE QUESTIONS

See the whole archive of questions.

QUESTIONS ARCHIVE

SIGN UP NOW FOR FREE

  • search our library of 1000+ hockey drills
  • create professional hockey coaching plans
  • or access our tried and tested hockey plans

Sportplan App

Give it a try - it's better in the app

YOUR SESSION IS STARTING SOON... Join the worlds largest hockey coaching resource for 1000+ drills and pro tools to make coaching easy.
LET'S DO IT